The article makes the assumption that the likes of Walmart, Walgreens and CVS should be responsible for "monitoring" what doctors legitimate prescriptions are being asked to fill, as if they were doing anything illegal by doing this. If a licensed MD writes a prescription for a medication, their responsibility begins and ends with fulfilling that legally authorized prescription. It is bizarre to think that these companies should have some system in place to refuse to fill these legally authorized prescriptions. If the DEA wants these drugs off the street, they should work with congress to have these drugs added to the Schedule I list. Speaking of the Schedule I list, which includes Heroin (an opiod), I've never understood the rationale that could conclude that Heroin (an opiod) would be listed as a Schedule I (no medical benefit), yet all the other opiod analogs are not listed there as well. As a matter of fact, there is an Analogs Act [0] that has been in place to specifically deal with analogs of Schedule I substances. These drugs, like Oxycontin, Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, other opiod analogs, you would think would fall under the Analogs Act, but for some reason they were lobbied to not be part of that -- therefore allowing a few large players to make billions of dollars a year because of it and allow millions of people to overdose.
I don't understand why you would post a comment that ignores so much information in the article, starting with the very first paragraph. There are in fact laws about reporting unusual volumes of drug sales and people employed by drugstores specifically to perform that task.
It seems like you just wanted to express your opinion and did so by suggesting that the article was somehow misleading or not grounded in reality.
I think you're being unfair to the above poster.
They expressed both sides of the issue. That what they're doing isn't technically illegal, and that they've obviously lobbied congress to keep certain drugs available because they can legally fulfill them for massive profits.
By no means did the above poster give these companies a pass, they just did it in a way that's closer to reality and less histrionic.
Pharmacists' job includes watching for mistakes in what the MDs choose to prescribe. That's why they are required to go through a challenging college program and get licensed.
This isn’t about doctors making mistakes, this is about doctors intentionally prescribing opioids to people who want them just to get high. How is a pharmacist supposed to know who has legitimate pain versus those who don’t? That conversation happens between the patient and the doctor.
The only way you would know is do you had a system wide view and could see which doctors are prescribing abnormally high amounts of opioids, not something in the purview of a pharmacy.
When your county is devastated by opioids and your pharmacy sells more opioids than your entire state should be reasonably consuming [0] maybe alarms bells should ring.
[0] happened in WV
It is absolutely a pharmacy and pharmacists job to understand and monitor what drugs are being prescribed to their patients, and intervene in cases of harm.
How is a pharmacist supposed to know if an opioid is legitimate or not? Anyone can claim to have a pain issue and if the opioid isn’t mixed with other problematic medicines, what other indication does a pharmacist have that the doctor is dealing drugs?
According to the article, the alarm bells should be going off when there are obviously absurd amounts of drugs are being ordered.
>The Walgreens employee was bewildered by the quantity of opioids the company was shipping to just one store. Its pharmacy in Port Richey, Fla. (population 2,831) was ordering 3,271 bottles of oxycodone a month.
From another article on the same topic:
>The company sold 6.4m pills to the small pharmacy, notorious in a town of about 3,000 people for the long lines of out of state cars at its drive-through window.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/19/opioids-cris...
“How is a pharmacist supposed to know if an opioid is legitimate or not? ”
Any single prescription, there is no way.
But if your selling enough pain pills to give everyone in your county 10 daily doses, perhaps you should call the state attorney general.
Technically the pharmacist is dealing drugs.
You think there's a rationale behind the drug schedules? I mean other than locking up undesirables? There you go, that's your problem. I recommend learning about history. That'll get rid of such silly, incoherent thoughts.